It is very good at seeing which processes are using the most CPU time. Spunk.funk above mentioned Process Explorer. Here you can uncheck the services that you don't want to run. Go to run>msconfig and pick the "services" tab.
Next is to turn off those unneeded services that hide under "scvhost" in the device manager. You can either move the shortcut to another folder (like hold or what ever you want to name it) or simply remove the shortcut altogether.Ģ. That's where some programs load a shortcut to start when you boot the computer. THEY LOAD FINE IF THEY ARE STARTED FROM HARD DRIVE, no need to have them in memory.'Īnother place to look is in the startup up folder. 'note.all programmers seem to think that their programs should be loaded into memory at startup so they will be available instantly at a touch of a key. Uncheck any items that you don't want to run. Here are some ways to turn off those processes that you don't need.ġ. I too remember the old dos days when memory was very expensive and you needed to keep everything not needed from running.įrom above, you have 40 processes running. I have chased the same rabbit that you are chasing right now (functions using up my memory). You have been getting some very good advice form all the guys above. The memory manager knows what it is doing, even if most users do not. Microsoft has done an enormous amount of research and testing on the memory management in Windows. Memory management in XP is vastly more complex and sophisticated than you imagine. A large value for the system cache is a good thing, a very good thing. Reducing the memory used by the system, if it could be done, would impair performance. The memory manager will always try to allocate memory where it will do the most good to improve performance. When an application requires more memory the system usage will be cut back, drastically if necessary.
The memory manager has currently allocated a large amount of memory to the system because there is currently no better use for it. The memory used by the system is by no means a fixed quantity. Even if you leaned out your system to bare bones for memory use, you're only talking about saving maybe an extra 500 mb.Īs others have said, there is nothing unusual or wrong in the task Manager display. Maybe you need some of them, maybe you don't. All those little icons in the lower right of your screen are programs that are running in the background as well, and using up memory. Add em up, that's where your memory is going. Under the column Memory Usage is the amount of memory that's being used by each program.
Memory monitor xp software#
If you open Task Manager and look under Processes, you'll see a list of all the software and Windows programs that are running in the background.
Memory monitor xp Pc#
That's why it's not uncommon to add ram to a computer and find that you're now using more main memory than before the upgrade, but the PC will still run faster. The amount of info placed in the swap file will decrease when you add more memory. This method is slower than accessing RAM directly and needs to be done more frequently when the computer is low on RAM. This is where Windows takes some frequently used information from main memory and temporarily places it in a special file on your hard drive. But, I'm sure they take into consideration the use of a swap file. I've never understood how Microsoft calculates their minimum memory requirements, and what they recommend vs. If you gave me your computer to repair, I'd give it back and tell you the same thing. If it's an online game, you'd have to investigate your network speeds. Now, if you are having problems running a game, you have to compare the hardware and memory your system has to what's recommended by the game manufacturer to see if you meet their requirements. It's like remodeling to make an empty closet bigger.Īs operating systems and software evolve, they get more complex and use more processor power and memory. Especially when you still have 2 gigs free. You could probably shave a few MBs off the amount of memory you're using now, but it's not going to make a difference. As it stands, you are within the norm for memory usage with Windows XP. You would have to give me a specific error or problem you're running into before I could offer you a solution.
0 kommentar(er)
